Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Radiology, Medical School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Medical Students’ Research Centre, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran

4 Alzahra Research Institute, Alzahra University Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive cardiovascular imaging procedure that visualizes coronary artery calcifications (CAC), a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis. Due to different calcification patterns in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) compared to the general population, this study aims to present diagnostic cut-off values for CAC to detect early coronary artery disease (CAD) in CKD patients.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 807 patients: 407 with CKD and 400 controls with normal kidney function who underwent CCTA during 2019-2021. CAC score measurements were performed for all left main coronary arteries to investigate CAD. The Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) was used as the gold standard to determine the value of CAC, and diagnostic values were measured.
RESULTS: The number of female patients was 443 (54.9%), and 364 (45.1%) were male. The mean age in the case group was 63.95 ± 10.26 years, and in the control group, it was 53.80 ± 11.84 years. At the cut-off point of 85, the CAC score had a sensitivity and specificity of 84.7% and 83%, respectively, among patients with CKD to detect CAD (Area Under the Curve (AUC): 0.919, 95% CI: 0.89-0.94; P-value < 0.001). Considering a cut-point of 85 for CAC, the frequency of healthy subjects with CAD-RADS less than two was significantly higher than the cases (P-value = 0.012), while the two groups were similar regarding CAD-RADS 3-5 (P-value = 0.83).
CONCLUSION: According to this study, the CAC score is a valuable means to detect CAD among CKD subjects. There is no significant difference in CAC between patients with substantial CAD-RADS in CKD and non-CKD patients. The cut-point of 85 for the CAC score was found valuable to diagnose CAD with over 80% sensitivity and specificity.

Keywords

  1. 1. Members TF, Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013 Oct;34(38):2949-3003. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht296

    2. Jia S, Liu Y, Yuan J. Jia S, Liu Y, Yuan J. Evidence in Guidelines for Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1177:37-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2517-9_2

    3. Rijlaarsdam-Hermsen D, van Domburg RT, Deckers JW, Kuijpers D, van Dijkman PRM. Comparison of guidelines for diagnosing suspected stable angina and the additional value of the calcium score. Int J Cardiol. 2021 Dec 1;344:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.09.039

    4. Goff DC, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D’agostino RB, Gibbons R, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2935-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.005

    5. Faggiano A, Santangelo G, Carugo S, Pressman G, Picano E, Faggiano P. Cardiovascular Calcification as a Marker of Increased Cardiovascular Risk and a Surrogate for Subclinical Atherosclerosis: Role of Echocardiography. J Clin Med. 2021Apr 13;10(8):1668. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081668

    6. Greenland P, Blaha MJ, Budoff MJ, Erbel R, Watson KE. Coronary Calcium Score and Cardiovascular Risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):434-47. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jacc.2018.05.027

    7. Di Cesare E, Patriarca L, Panebianco L, Bruno F, Palumbo P, Cannizzaro E, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of intermediate risk asymptomatic individuals. Radiol Med. 2018 Sep;123(9):686-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0898-z

    1. Cho I, Chang HJ, Ó Hartaigh B, Shin S, Sung JM, Lin FY, et al. Incremental prognostic utility of coronary CT angiography for asymptomatic patients based upon extent and severity of coronary artery calcium: results from the COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes InteRnational Multicenter (CONFIRM) study. Eur Heart J. 2015 Feb 21;36(8):501-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu358, Errat-um in: Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 7;36(46):3287. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv247
    2. Andreini D, Martuscelli E, Guaricci AI, Carrabba N, Magnoni M, Tedeschi C, et al. Clinical recommendations on Cardiac-CT in 2015: a position paper of the Working Group on Cardiac-CT and Nuclear Cardiology of the Italian Society of Cardiology. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2016 Feb;17(2):73-84. https://doi.org/10.2459/jcm.0000000000000318

    10. Wolk MJ, Bailey SR, Doherty JU, Douglas PS, Hendel RC, Kramer CM, et al. ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 4;63(4):380-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.009

    11. Di Cesare E, Carbone I, Carriero A, Centonze M, De Cobelli F, De Rosa R. Clinical indications for cardiac computed tomography. From the Working Group of the Cardiac Radiology Section of the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM). Radiol Med. 2012 Sep;117(6):901-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-012-0814-x

    12. Rizvi A, Han D, Danad I, ó Hartaigh B, Lee JH, Gransar H, et al. Diagnostic Performance of Hybrid Cardiac Imaging Methods for Assessment of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Compared With Stand-Alone Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Meta-Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Apr;11(4):589-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.05.020

    1. Moss AJ, Williams MC, Newby DE, Nicol ED. The Updated NICE Guidelines: Cardiac CT as the First-Line Test for Coronary Artery Disease. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2017;10(5):15. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs12410-017-9412-6

    14. Kim YJ, Yong HS, Kim SM, Kim JA, Yang DH, Hong YJ; Korean Society of Radiology; Korean Society of Cardiology. Korean guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac CT. Korean J Radiol. 2015 Mar-Apr;16(2):251-85. https://doi.org/10.3348%2Fkjr.2015.16.2.251

    15. Liu M, Li XC, Lu L, Cao Y, Sun RR, Chen S, Zhang PY. Cardiovascular disease and its relationship with chronic kidney disease. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014 Oct;18(19):2918-26.

    16. Yuan J, Zou X-R, Han S-P, Cheng H, Wang L, Wang J-W, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for cardiovascular disease among chronic kidney disease patients: results from the Chinese cohort study of chronic kidney disease (C-STRIDE). BMC Nephrol. 2017 Jan 14;18(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186%2Fs12882-017-0441-9

    17. Afsar B, Turkmen K, Covic A, Kanbay M. Afsar B, Turkmen K, Covic A, Kanbay M. An update on coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease. Int J Nephrol. 2014;2014:767424. https://doi.org/10.1155%2F2014%2F767424

    18. Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E, Kausz AT, Levin A, Steffes MW, et al. National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jul 15;139(2):137-47. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-139-2-200307150-00013

    19. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Mar 15;15(4):827-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t

    20. Rodriguez-Granillo GA, Carrascosa P, Goldsmit A, Arbab-Zadeh A. Invasive coronary angiography findings across the CAD-RADS classification spectrum. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Nov;35(11):1955-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01654-1

    21. Criqui MH, Denenberg JO, Ix JH, McClelland RL, Wassel CL, Rifkin DE, et al. Calcium density of coronary artery plaque and risk of incident cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2014 Jan 15;311(3):271-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.282535

    22. Bavishi C, Argulian E, Chatterjee S, Rozanski A. CACS and the Frequency of Stress-Induced Myocardial Ischemia During MPI: A Meta-Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 May;9(5):580-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.11.023

    23. Tison GH, Guo M, Blaha MJ, McClelland RL, Allison MA, Szklo M, et al. Multisite extracoronary calcification indicates increased risk of coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 Sep-Oct;9(5):406-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2015.03.012

    24. Kaczmarska E, Kępka C, Dzielińska Z, Pracoń R, Kryczka K, Petryka J, et al. What is the optimal cut-off point for low coronary artery calcium score assessed by computed tomography? Multi-Detector Computed Tomography ANIN Registry. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2013;9(1):9-15. https://doi.org/10.5114/pwki.2013.34024

    25. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Nieman K, Jang I-K, Ferencik M, Rahman AM, et al. Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Apr 18;47(8):1655-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.01.041

    26. Tay SY, Chang PY, Lao WT, Lin YC, Chung YH, Chan WP. The proper use of coronary calcium score and coronary computed tomography angiography for screening asymptomatic patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 15;7(1):17653. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17655-w

    27. Nakanishi R, Li D, Blaha MJ, Whelton SP, Matsumoto S, Alani A, et al. The relationship between coronary artery calcium score and the long-term mortality among patients with minimal or absent coronary artery risk factors. Int J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 15;185:275-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.146

    28. Dedic A, Gert-Jan R, Roos CJ, Neefjes LA, de Graaf MA, Spronk A, et al. Prognostic Value of Coronary Computed Tomography Imaging in Patients at High Risk Without Symptoms of Coronary Artery Disease. Am J Cardiol. 2016 Mar 1;117(5):768-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.11.058

    1. Plank F, Friedrich G, Dichtl W, Klauser A, Jaschke W, Franz W-M, et al. The diagnostic and prognostic value of coronary CT angiography in asymptomatic high-risk patients: a cohort study. Open Heart. 2014 Aug 12;1(1):e000096. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000096

    30. Villines TC, Hulten EA, Shaw LJ, Goyal M, Dunning A, Achenbach S, et al. Prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease and adverse events among symptomatic patients with coronary artery calcification scores of zero undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography: results from the CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Dec 6;58(24):2533-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.851

    31. Blaha MJ, Cainzos-Achirica M, Greenland P, McEvoy JW, Blankstein R, Budoff MJ, et al. Role of Coronary Artery Calcium Score of Zero and Other Negative Risk Markers for Cardiovascular Disease: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation. 2016 Mar 1;133(9):849-58. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.115.018524

    32. Yeboah J, McClelland RL, Polonsky TS, Burke GL, Sibley CT, O’Leary D, et al. Comparison of novel risk markers for improvement in cardiovascular risk assessment in intermediate-risk individuals. JAMA. 2012 Aug 22;308(8):788-95. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.9624

    33. Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, Liu ST, Weinstein SR, Tseng PH, Flores FR, et al. Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 8;49(18):1860-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.079

    34. Shaw LJ, Giambrone AE, Blaha MJ, Knapper JT, Berman DS, Bellam N, et al. Long-Term Prognosis After Coronary Artery Calcification Testing in Asymptomatic Patients: A Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jul 7;163(1):14-21. https://doi.org/10.7326/m14-0612

    35. Valenti V, ó Hartaigh B, Heo R, Cho I, Schulman-Marcus J, Gransar H, et al. A 15-Year Warranty Period for Asymptomatic Individuals Without Coronary Artery Calcium: A Prospective Follow-Up of 9,715 Individuals. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Aug;8(8):900-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.01.025

    36. Cho I, Min H-S, Chun EJ, Park SK, Choi Y, Blumenthal RS, et al. Coronary atherosclerosis detected by coronary CT angiography in asymptomatic subjects with early chronic kidney disease. Atherosclerosis. 2010 Feb;208(2):406-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.08.040

    37. Yiu K, de Graaf F, van Velzen J, Marsan N, Roos C, de Bie M, et al. Different value of coronary calcium score to predict obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with and without moderate chronic kidney disease. Neth Heart J. 2013 Jul;21(7-8):347-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-013-0409-8

    38. Fujimoto N, Iseki K, Tokuyama K, Tamashiro M, Takishita S. Significance of coronary artery calcification score (CACS) for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in chronic dialysis patients. Clin Chim Acta. 2006 May;367(1-2):98-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2005.11.028

    39. Robinson J, Tan AU, Wilensky RL, Matthai W, Munoz M, Rosas SE. Electron-beam computerized tomography correlates with coronary angiogram in chronic kidney disease patients. Am J Nephrol. 2007;27(3):247-52. https://doi.org/10.1159/000101370

    40. Chae HB, Lee SY, Kim NH, Han KJ, Lee TH, Jang CM, et al. Age Is the Strongest Effector for the Relationship between Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Coronary Artery Calcification in Apparently Healthy Korean Adults. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2014 Sep;29(3):312-9. https://doi.org/10.3803/enm.2014.29.3.312

    41. Choi IJ, Lim S, Choo EH, Kim JJ, Hwang BH, Kim TH, et al. Differential Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on Coronary Calcification and Atherosclerosis in Asymptomatic Individuals with or without Diabetes: Analysis from a Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Registry. Cardiorenal Med. 2018;8(3):228-36. https://doi.org/10.1159/000489097

    42. Jung CY, Yun HR, Park JT, Joo YS, Kim HW, Yoo TH, et al. Association of coronary artery calcium with adverse cardiovascular outcomes and death in patients with chronic kidney disease: results from the KNOW-CKD. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023 Feb 28;38(3):712-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfac194

    43. Kim Y, Kang J, Chang Y, Hyun YY, Lee KB, Shin H, et al. Coronary artery calcium and risk of chronic kidney disease in young and middle-aged adults. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023 May 31;38(6):1439-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfac272

    44. Oh TR, Song SH, Choi HS, Suh SH, Kim CS, Jung JY, et al. Predictive Model for High Coronary Artery Calcium Score in Young Patients with Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease. J Pers Med. 2021 Dec 15;11(12):1372. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11121372

    45. Sørensen IM, Bisgaard LS, Bjergfelt SS, Ballegaard EL, Biering-Sørensen T, Landler NE, et al. The metabolic signature of cardiovascular disease and arterial calcification in patients with chronic kidney disease. Atherosclerosis. 2022 Jun;350:109-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2022.03.019