Document Type : Original Article(s)
Authors
- Hamid Ghaderi 1
- Manouchehr Hekmat 1
- Saina Motahedin 2
- Zahra Ansari Aval 1
- Mahmoud Beheshti Monfared 1
- Alireza Omidi Farzin 3
- Seyedeh Adeleh Mirjafari 4
- Hamed Askarpour 1
- Mandana Hekmat 5
- Mahya Hekmat 6
1 Cardiovascular Research Center, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Pediatrics, Ali-Asghar Children`s Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Cardiovascular Research Center, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
4 Islamic Azad University, Pharmaceutical Sciences Branch, in Tehran, Iran
5 Shahid Beheshti University of Medical sciences. Tehran, Iran
6 Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is still a controversy about the best method for preoperative skin preparation (skin cleaning). The main antiseptic solution used in the cardiac surgery room is Povidone Iodine (PI), which is used to prepare the area to be operated on.
This study aimed to determine the urinary iodine level in children (newborns, infants, and toddlers) undergoing open and closed heart surgery, in whom preoperative skin preparation was performed using PI solution.
METHOD: This study was conducted over eight years on a total of 212 children who underwent cardiac surgery. A form was developed for each patient in which all their details, condition, and type of surgery were recorded. A urine sample was taken after the patients were anesthetized and before they were painted with PI through the urinary catheter that had to be attached to them for the cardiac surgery. The patients were then prepped with PI and draped and the surgery was performed. Afterwards, the second and third urine samples were taken 24 and 48 hours after the surgery from the urine collection bag. The samples were transferred to polyethylene tubes with screw caps in a cold box at -20 °C and sent to the iodine reference laboratory of the Endocrinology Research Center of Shahid Beheshti University. The samples were measured using the kinetic colorimetric reaction proposed by Sandell and Kolthoff after the acid digestion of urine.
RESULTS: A total of 212 patients (newborns, infants, toddlers) who underwent (open and closed) cardiac surgery entered the study, including 104 (49.1%) males and 108 (50.9%) females. The patients ranged in age from 1 day to 14 years (mean = 168 months). The urinary iodine level was 40.6±21.9 μgr/dl in the first stage (pre-surgery),204.1±92.5 μgr/dl in the second stage (24 hours post-surgery), and 130.3±56.2μgr/dl in the third stage (48 hours post-surgery).
Urinary iodine levels increased dramatically after PI use, and the second-stage urinary iodine changes (24 hours post-surgery) were in the excessive range according to the WHO classification, and they decreased gradually over the next 24 hours, but did not reach normal levels until 48 hours post-surgery. The difference between the samples was significant (P<0.05)
The samples were also separately analyzed by age group (groupA:0-2 years and group B: 2-14 years), which showed that transcutaneous iodine absorption and urinary iodine excretion were high in both age group.
CONCLUSION: In children, transcutaneous iodine absorption following preoperative skin preparation with PI (for cardiac surgery) is so high that its urinary excretion reaches an excessive level 24 hours after surgery and remains higher than normal until 48 hours’ post-surgery. Furthermore, the transcutaneous absorption of iodine is similar in the 0-2 and 2-14-year-old age groups, and the iodine level following its transcutaneous absorption is excessive in both age groups.
Keywords
- Mitchell I, Pollock J, Jamieson M, Fitzpatrick K, Logan R. Transcutaneous iodine absorption in infants undergoing cardiac operation. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 1991;52(5):1138-40.
- Johnson J, Akinboyo IC, Schaffzin JK. Infection Prevention in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Clin Perinatol. 2021 Jun;48(2):413-429. doi: 10.1016/j. clp.2021.03.011. PMID: 34030822; PMCID: PMC8162277.
- Günday M, Orhan A, Turan H, Körez MK. Is there a difference between two different skin disinfection methods in cardiac surgery in terms of isolated pathogens? J Infect Dev Ctries. 2020 Jun 30;14(6):647- 653. doi: 10.3855/jidc.12459. PMID: 32683356.
- Roth JA, Schwab C, Atkinson A, von Flüe M, Kettelhack C, Eckstein FS, Battegay M, Klimke S, Frei R, Widmer AF. Are three antiseptic paints needed for safe preparation of the surgical field? A prospective cohort study with 239 patients. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Jul 31;9(1):120. doi: 10.1186/ s13756-020-00780-z. PMID: 32736650; PMCID: PMC7393917.
- Neghabi Z, Amiri H, Aghabiklooei A, Shekofte HS. Relationship of serum lead level in patients consuming oral opium with abdominal pain. Journal of Preventive Epidemiology. 2019;4(2):e10-e.
- Boisson M, Corbi P, Kerforne T, Camilleri L, Debauchez M, Demondion P, et al. Multicentre, openlabel, randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing 2% chlorhexidine–70% isopropanol and 5% povidone iodine–69% ethanol for skin antisepsis in reducing surgical-site infection after cardiac surgery: the CLEAN 2 study protocol. BMJ open. 2019;9(6):e026929.
- Raja SG, Rochon M, Mullins C, Morais C, Kourliouros A, Wishart E, et al. Impact of choice of skin preparation solution in cardiac surgery on rate of surgical site infection: a propensity score matched analysis. Journal of infection prevention. 2018;19(1):16-21.
- Nesvadbova M, Crosera M, Maina G, Filon FL. Povidone iodine skin absorption: an ex-vivo study. Toxicology letters. 2015;235(3):155-60.
- Fallah S, Siani NG. Environmental contamination by nanoparticles may threat human health. Journal of Preventive Epidemiology. 2015;1(2):e17.
- Shahbazi-Gahrouei D, Keshtkar M. Magnetic nanoparticles and cancer treatment. Immunopathologia Persa. 2016;2(1):e03.
- Haas NA, Camphausen CK, Kececioglu D. Clinical review: thyroid hormone replacement in children after cardiac surgery--is it worth a try? Crit Care. 2006;10(3):213. doi: 10.1186/cc4924. Epub 2006 May 23. PMID: 16719939; PMCID: PMC1550942.
- Nesvadbova M, Crosera M, Maina G, Larese Filon F. Povidone iodine skin absorption: an ex-vivo study. Toxicol Lett. 2015 Jun 15;235(3):155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Apr 6. PMID: 25858112.
- Rajakumari R, Volova T, Oluwafemi OS, Rajeshkumar S, Thomas S, Kalarikkal N. Nano formulated proanthocyanidins as an effective wound healing component. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020 Jan;106:110056. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110056. Epub 2019 Aug 5. PMID: 31753372.
- Boisson M, Corbi P, Kerforne T, Camilleri L, Debauchez M, Demondion P, Eljezi V, Flecher E, Lepelletier D, Leprince P, Nesseler N, Nizou JY, Roussel JC, Rozec B, Ruckly S, Lucet JC, Timsit JF, Mimoz O. Multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing 2% chlorhexidine-70% isopropanol and 5% povidone iodine-69% ethanol for skin antisepsis in reducing surgical-site infection after cardiac surgery: the CLEAN 2 study protocol. BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 17;9(6):e026929. doi: 10.1136/ bmjopen-2018-026929. PMID: 31213447; PMCID: PMC6596966.
- Sato-Boku A, Nagano K, Hasegawa Y, Kamimura Y, Sento Y, So M, Kako E, Okuda M, Tachi N, Ito H, Adachi Y, Sobue K. Comparison of disinfection effect between benzalkonium chloride and povidone iodine in nasotracheal intubation: a randomized trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Aug 31;19(1):168. doi: 10.1186/ s12871-019-0839-y. PMID: 31470798; PMCID: PMC6717375.
- Manolis AS, Melita H. Prevention of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections: Single Operator Technique with Use of Povidone-Iodine, Double Gloving, Meticulous Aseptic/Antiseptic Measures and Antibiotic Prophylaxis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Jan;40(1):26-34. doi: 10.1111/ pace.12996. Epub 2017 Jan 17. PMID: 27996097.
- Chabrolle J, Rossier A. Goitre and hypothyroidism in the newborn after cutaneous absorption of iodine. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 1978;53(6):495-8.
- Hannan MM, O’Sullivan KE, Higgins AM, Murphy AM, McCarthy J, Ryan E, Hurley JP. The Combined Impact of Surgical Team Education and Chlorhexidine 2% Alcohol on the Reduction of Surgical Site Infection following Cardiac Surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Dec;16(6):799-805. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.033. Epub 2015 Aug 10. PMID: 26258558.
- Maeda N, Mori N, Shinjoh M, Komiyama O, Takahashi T. Comparison of 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate alcohol with 10% povidone-iodine for skin disinfection in children to prevent blood culture contamination. J Infect Chemother. 2021 Jul;27(7):1027-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.02.027. Epub 2021 Mar 13. PMID: 33727027.
- Costa ACD, Santa-Cruz F, Ferraz ÁAB. WHAT’S NEW IN INFECTION ON SURGICAL SITE AND ANTIBIOTICOPROPHYLAXIS IN SURGERY? Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2021 Jan 25;33(4):e1558. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020200004e1558. PMID: 33503118; PMCID: PMC7836071.
- Kolasiński W. Surgical site infections - review of current knowledge, methods of prevention. Pol Przegl Chir. 2018 Nov 6;91(4):41-47. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.7253. PMID: 31481640.
- Ghaderi H, Shamimi K, Moazzami F, Aminian A, Jalali SM, Afghani R, et al. A new look at an old dogma: wound complications in two methods of skin closure in uncomplicated appendicitis. Tehran University Medical Journal. 2010;68(1).
- Günday M, Orhan A, Turan H, Körez MK. Is there a difference between two different skin disinfection methods in cardiac surgery in terms of isolated pathogens? The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2020;14(06):647-53.