Document Type : Original Article(s)

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Professor, Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute AND Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Hypertension Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

4 Research Assistant, Heart Failure Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran

5 Interventional Cardiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

6 Professor, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

7 Professor, Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of socioeconomic status (SES) is an important aspect in community-based health studies and it is a major predictor of health and nutritional status as well as mortality and morbidity from many diseases. This study aimed to construct and validate socioeconomic status short-from questionnaire (SES-SQ) in Iranian population.METHODS: This cross-sectional methodological study was conducted among 1437 Iranian general population. Face and content validity of the developed questionnaire was evaluated qualitatively. Internal consistency, construct validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and latent class analysis (LCA), and convergent and known-group validity were also evaluated.RESULTS: The SES-SQ consisted of 6 items. The overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.64, showing acceptable internal consistency. EFA resulted in two factors explaining 47.78% of total variance. Three SES classes (low/middle/high) were extracted by LCA. The score of SES-SQ ranged from 0 to 17; two cutoff scores of 4.5 and 8.5 were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for differentiating low from middle and middle from high SES classes, respectively.CONCLUSION: An efficient, reliable, and valid short-form questionnaire was developed for evaluating SES in Iranian general population. The relevancy of questionnaire items is not lost over time.

Keywords

  1. Clark AM, DesMeules M, Luo W, Duncan AS, Wielgosz A. Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease: Risks and implications for care. Nat Rev Cardiol 2009; 6(11): 712-22.
  2. Bashinskaya B, Nahed BV, Walcott BP, Coumans JV, Onuma OK. Socioeconomic status correlates with the prevalence of advanced coronary artery disease in the United States. PLoS One 2012; 7(9): e46314.
  3. Businelle MS, Mills BA, Chartier KG, Kendzor DE, Reingle JM, Shuval K. Do stressful events account for the link between socioeconomic status and mental health? J Public Health (Oxf) 2014; 36(2): 205-12.
  4. Gershon AS, Dolmage TE, Stephenson A, Jackson B. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and socioeconomic status: A systematic review. COPD 2012; 9(3): 216-26.
  5. National Research Council, Anderson NB. Critical perspectives on racial and ethnic differences in health in late life. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
  6. Lago S, Cantarero D, Rivera B, Pascual M, Blazquez-Fernandez C, Casal B, et al. Socioeconomic status, health inequalities and
  7. non-communicable diseases: A systematic review. Z Gesundh Wiss 2018; 26(1): 1-14.
  8. Braveman PA, Cubbin C, Egerter S, Chideya S, Marchi KS, Metzler M, et al. Socioeconomic status in health research: One size does not fit all. JAMA 2005; 294(22): 2879-88.
  9. Juhn YJ, Beebe TJ, Finnie DM, Sloan J, Wheeler PH, Yawn B, et al. Development and initial testing of a new socioeconomic status measure based on housing data. J Urban Health 2011; 88(5): 933-44.
  10. Psaki SR, Seidman JC, Miller M, Gottlieb M, Bhutta ZA, Ahmed T, et al. Measuring socioeconomic status in multicountry studies: Results from the eight-country MAL-ED study. Popul Health Metr 2014; 12(1): 8.
  11. Shafiei S, Yazdani S, Jadidfard MP, Zafarmand AH. Measurement components of socioeconomic status in health-related studies in Iran. BMC Res Notes 2019; 12(1): 70.
  12. Baker E. Socioeconomic status, definition. In: Dingwall R, Quah SR, Cockerham WC, Editors. The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of health, illness, behavior, and society. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014.
  13. Chan CQH, Lee KH, Low LL. A systematic review of health status, health seeking behaviour and healthcare utilisation of low socioeconomic status populations in urban Singapore. Int J Equity Health 2018; 17(1): 39.
  14. Sarrafzadegan N, Talaei M, Sadeghi M, Kelishadi R, Oveisgharan S, Mohammadifard N, et al. The Isfahan cohort study: Rationale, methods and main findings. J Hum Hypertens 2011; 25(9): 545-53.
  15. Sarraf-Zadegan N, Sadri G, Malek AH, Baghaei M, Mohammadi FN, Shahrokhi S, et al. Isfahan Healthy Heart Programme: A comprehensive integrated community-based programme for cardiovascular disease prevention and control. Design, methods and initial experience. Acta Cardiol 2003; 58(4): 309-20.
  16. Hulin C, Netemeyer RG, Cudeck R. Can a reliability coefficient be too high? J Consum Psychol 2001; 10(1): 55-8.
  17. Tinsley HE, Brown SD. Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Science; 2000.
  18. McCutcheon AL, Hagenaars JA. Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
  19. Abobakri O, Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Alizadeh Aghdam MB, Imani A, Tabrizi J, et al. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Socioeconomic Status Questionnaire for Urban Households (SESIran): The Preliminary Version. Health Promot Perspect 2015; 5(4): 250-60.
  20. Hosseini-Shokouh SM, Arab M, Khoshmanzar J, Mousavi SM, Bahadori M. Design and validation of a questionnaire to assess household-level socioeconomic status: A mixed-methods study. Lancet 2018; 392: S80.
  21. Yadollahi M, Paim LH, Taboli H. Head of household characteristics and family economic status (FES) among Kerman households, Iran. Afr
  22. J Bus Manag 2013; 7(19): 1903-13.
  23. World Health Organization. WHO Housing and health guidelines [Online]. [cited 2018]; Available from: URL: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550376
  24. Pollack CE, Chideya S, Cubbin C, Williams B, Dekker M, Braveman P. Should health studies measure wealth? A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2007; 33(3): 250-64.
  25. Poirier MJP, Grignon M, Grepin KA, Dion ML. Transnational wealth-related health inequality measurement. SSM Popul Health 2018; 6: 259-75.