Association between the bifurcation angle and the angle of the origin of the left anterior descending with the severity of coronary artery disease

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Radiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Medical School, Isfahan, Iran

2 Department of Radiology Technology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Department of Statistics, Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

4 Department of Radiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

10.48305/arya.2025.45215.3052
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the association between the bifurcation angle and the angle of the origin of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery with the degree of proximal LAD (pLAD) stenosis.
METHODS: This study was cross-sectional and addressed 578 patients suspected of coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) because of angina pectoris symptoms at Shahid Chamran Hospital, Isfahan. PLAD stenosis as well as the left main (LM)-LAD and the LAD-left circumflex artery (LCX) (bifurcation) angles were assessed and recorded on CCTA images. Then, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or chi-squared tests were used. ROC analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of each of the two angles in identifying pLAD stenosis.
RESULTS: Using a cut-off value of 23º for the LM-LAD angle, the sensitivity and specificity for predicting pLAD stenosis <50% were 63.70% and 47.67%, respectively. In addition, using a cut-off value of 30º for the LM-LAD angle, the sensitivity and specificity for predicting pLAD stenosis ≥50% were 52.24% and 68.77%, respectively (P value<0.05). Moreover, for predicting pLAD stenosis <50%, a 49º cut-off for the LAD-LCX angle demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 61.64% and 56.99%, respectively. Furthermore, for predicting pLAD stenosis ≥50%, a 50º cut-off for the LAD-LCX angle yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 70.15% and 58.63%, respectively (P value<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The findings of this study showed that the LAD-LCX and LM-LAD angles had a direct and significant association with the severity of pLAD stenosis, such that wider angles were associated with greater pLAD stenosis.

Keywords


1- Sun Z, Wan YL, Hsieh I, Liu YC, Wen MS. Coronary CT angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Curr Med Imaging. 2013;9(3):184-93. https://doi.org/10.2174/15734056113096660010
2- Miszalski-Jamka T, Klimeczek P, Banyś R, Krupiński M, Nycz K, Bury K, et al. The composition and extent of coronary artery plaque detected by multislice computed tomographic angiography provides incremental prognostic value in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Mar;28(3):621-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9799-0
3- Cheng VY, Nakazato R, Dey D, Gurudevan S, Tabak J, Budoff MJ, et al. Reproducibility of coronary artery plaque volume and composition quantification by 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography: an intraobserver, interobserver, and interscan variability study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009 Sep-Oct;3(5):312-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2009.07.001
4- Serruys PW, Hara H, Garg S, Kawashima H, Nørgaard BL, Dweck MR, et al. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Complete Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Aug 17;78(7):713-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.06.019
5- Enrico B, Suranyi P, Thilo C, Bonomo L, Costello P, Schoepf UJ. Coronary artery plaque formation at coronary CT angiography: morphological analysis and relationship to hemodynamics. Eur Radiol. 2009 Apr;19(4):837-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1223-3
6- Kamangar S, Anjum Badruddin I, Anqi AE, Ahamed Saleel C, Tirth V, Yunus Khan TM, et al. Influence of bifurcation angle in left coronary artery with stenosis: A CFD analysis. Biomed Mater Eng. 2020;31(6):339-49. https://doi.org/10.3233/bme-201107
7- Sun Z, Xu L. Computational fluid dynamics in coronary artery disease. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2014 Dec;38(8):651-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.09.002
8- Morris PD, Narracott A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Silva Soto DA, Hsiao S, Lungu A, et al. Computational fluid dynamics modelling in cardiovascular medicine. Heart. 2016 Jan;102(1):18-28. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308044
9- Sun Z, Chaichana T. An investigation of correlation between left coronary bifurcation angle and hemodynamic changes in coronary stenosis by coronary computed tomography angiography-derived computational fluid dynamics. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2017 Oct;7(5):537-48. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2017.10.03
10- Moon SH, Byun JH, Kim JW, Kim SH, Kim KN, Jung JJ, et al. Clinical usefulness of the angle between left main coronary artery and left anterior descending coronary artery for the evaluation of obstructive coronary artery disease. PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0202249. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202249
11- Temov K, Sun Z. Coronary computed tomography angiography investigation of the association between left main coronary artery bifurcation angle and risk factors of coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jun;32 Suppl 1:129-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-016-0884-2
12- Tsugu T, Tanaka K. Differences in fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography according to coronary artery bifurcation angle. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2022 Jan;50(1):83-84. https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2022.21104
13- Chaichana T, Sun Z, Jewkes J. Computation of hemodynamics in the left coronary artery with variable angulations. J Biomech. 2011 Jul 7;44(10):1869-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.033
14- Yahia M, Farid W, Lotfy M, Osama M, El Deep HA. Association between bifurcation angle of the left main coronary artery and severity of stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending artery. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2023 May-Jun 23;34(2):93-97. https://doi.org/10.5830/cvja-2022-031
15- Konishi T, Yamamoto T, Funayama N, Nishihara H, Hotta D. Relationship between left coronary artery bifurcation angle and restenosis after stenting of the proximal left anterior descending artery. Coron Artery Dis. 2016 Sep;27(6):449-59. https://doi.org/10.1097/mca.0000000000000381
16- Rodgers JL, Jones J, Bolleddu SI, Vanthenapalli S, Rodgers LE, Shah K, et al. Cardiovascular Risks Associated with Gender and Aging. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2019 Apr 27;6(2):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd6020019
17- Malakar AK, Choudhury D, Halder B, Paul P, Uddin A, Chakraborty S. A review on coronary artery disease, its risk factors, and therapeutics. J Cell Physiol. 2019 Aug;234(10):16812-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.28350
18- Sun Z, Cao Y. Multislice CT angiography assessment of left coronary artery: correlation between bifurcation angle and dimensions and development of coronary artery disease. Eur J Radiol. 2011 Aug;79(2):e90-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.015
19- Rodriguez-Granillo GA, Rosales MA, Degrossi E, Durbano I, Rodriguez AE. Multislice CT coronary angiography for the detection of burden, morphology and distribution of atherosclerotic plaques in the left main bifurcation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2007 Jun;23(3):389-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-006-9144-1
20- Girasis C, Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Colombo A, Holmes DR Jr, Feldman TE, et al. 3-Dimensional bifurcation angle analysis in patients with left main disease: a substudy of the SYNTAX trial (SYNergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXus and Cardiac Surgery). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan;3(1):41-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.019
21- Cecchi E, Giglioli C, Valente S, Lazzeri C, Gensini GF, Abbate R, et al. Role of hemodynamic shear stress in cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis. 2011 Feb;214(2):249-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.09.008
22- VanderLaan PA, Reardon CA, Getz GS. Site specificity of atherosclerosis: site-selective responses to atherosclerotic modulators. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004 Jan;24(1):12-22. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.0000105054.43931.f0
23- Juan YH, Tsay PK, Shen WC, Yeh CS, Wen MS, Wan YL. Comparison of the Left Main Coronary Bifurcating Angle among Patients with Normal, Non-significantly and Significantly Stenosed Left Coronary Arteries. Sci Rep. 2017 May 4;7(1):1515-20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01679-3