Document Type : Short Communication


1 Professor, Hypertension Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Assistant professor, Interventional Cardiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

4 Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

5 Heart Failure Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

6 Assistant Professor, Hypertension Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran


BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) has been marked as standard practice during the past decades. We aimed to investigate the shortand long-term outcomes of EVAR in patients with AAAs in Isfahan, Iran. .
METHODS: This retrospective study conducted on 50 patients with AAAs who have undergone EVAR procedure consequently in four different hospitals (Chamran hospital, Asgarieh hospital, Sepahan hospital and Saadi hospital) in Isfahan, Iran, between 2017 to 2020. We followed patients for one year and recorded short-term and one-year outcome include Endoleak, Aorta-iliac expansion, and mortality in hospital records during one year and telephone follow up. Data was entered in SPSS (ver.25) and analyzed with Univariate Linear Regression and Chi-Square Test.
RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 66.6±11.7 years old, in which 88%(n=44) of them were male. Elective EVAR was performed in 88% of patients. Regarding the complications one year after EVAR, endoleak and CIN (contrast-induced nephropathy) were occurred in 6%(n=3) and 6%(n=3) of patients, respectively. We also reported the rate of in-hospital mortality and one-year mortality as 2%(n=1) and 8%(n=4), respectively. Univariate regression analysis revealed no significant difference regarding one-year mortality in patients who underwent EVAR. In patients who underwent spinal anesthesia in comparison with general and regional anesthesia before EVAR, there were lower rate of vascular complications [0% (n=0) versus 23.5% (n=4) and 20.0% (n=2), P=0.053], level of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) [9.8 ± 13.9 versus 17.0 ± 13.1 and 14 ± 6.2, P=0.031] and creatinine (Cr) [0.6±1.1 versus 1.1±0.6 and 1.3±0.5, P=0.005], respectively.
CONCLUSION: Desirable short- and long-term outcomes as expected, combined with a reduction in hospital length of stay and mortality and one-year mortality allowed EVAR to become the favorable therapeutic strategy for AAAs in Iran especially in high-risk patients. Lower rate of vascular complications, ICU length of stay and lower level of BUN and Cr were observed using spinal anesthesia in patients who underwent EVAR in our centers.


  1. Sakalihasan N, Michel J-B, Katsargyris A, Kuivaniemi H, Defraigne J-O, Nchimi A, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. Nature reviews Disease primers. 2018;4(1):1-22.
  2. Gianfagna F, Veronesi G, Tozzi M, Tarallo A, Borchini R, Ferrario MM, et al. Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the general population and in subgroups at high cardiovascular risk in Italy. Results of the RoCAV population based study. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2018;55(5):633-9.
  3. Lindholt JS, Diederichsen AC, Rasmussen LM, Frost L, Steffensen FH, Lambrechtsen J, et al. Survival, prevalence, progression and repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Results from three randomised controlled screening trials over three decades. Clinical epidemiology. 2020;12:95.
  4. Jahangir E, Lipworth L, Edwards TL, Kabagambe EK, Mumma MT, Mensah GA, et al. Smoking, sex, risk factors and abdominal aortic aneurysms: a prospective study of 18 782 persons aged above 65 years in the Southern Community Cohort Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(5):481-8.
  5. Summers KL, Kerut EK, Sheahan CM, Sheahan III MG. Evaluating the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States through a national screening database. Journal of vascular surgery. 2021;73(1):61-8.
  6. Karthikesalingam A, Holt PJ, Vidal-Diez A, Ozdemir BA, Poloniecki JD, Hinchliffe RJ, et al. Mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: clinical lessons from a comparison of outcomes in England and the USA. The Lancet. 2014;383(9921):963-9.
  7. Karthikesalingam A, Vidal-Diez A, Holt PJ, Loftus IM, Schermerhorn ML, Soden PA, et al. Thresholds for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in England and the United States. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;375(21):2051-9.
  8. Erhart P, Hyhlik-Dürr A, Geisbüsch P, Kotelis D, Müller-Eschner M, Gasser TC, et al. Finite element analysis in asymptomatic, symptomatic, and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: in search of new rupture risk predictors. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2015;49(3):239-45.
  9. Anagnostakos J, Lal BK. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases. 2021.
  10. Forneris A, Kennard J, Ismaguilova A, Shepherd RD, Studer D, Bromley A, et al. Linking aortic mechanical properties, gene expression and microstructure: A new perspective on regional weakening in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2021;8:47.
  11. Ribeiro T, Ferreira RS, Catarino J, Vieira I, Correia R, Bento R, et al., editors. Primary Aortocaval Fistula in Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Institutional Experience and Literature Review. EJVES Vascular Forum; 2021: Elsevier.
  12. Kuivaniemi H, Ryer EJ, Elmore JR, Tromp G. Understanding the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Expert review of cardiovascular therapy. 2015;13(9):975-87.
  13. Ullery BW, Hallett RL, Fleischmann D. Epidemiology and contemporary management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Abdominal Radiology. 2018;43(5):1032- 43.
  14. Erhart P, Cakmak S, Grond-Ginsbach C, Hakimi M, Böckler D, Dihlmann S. Inflammasome activity in leucocytes decreases with abdominal aortic aneurysm progression. International journal of molecular medicine. 2019;44(4):1299-308.
  15. van Schaik TG, Yeung KK, Verhagen HJ, de Bruin JL, van Sambeek MR, Balm R, et al. Long-term survival and secondary procedures after open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Journal of vascular surgery. 2017;66(5):1379-89.
  16. Parodi J, Palmaz J, Barone H. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Annals of vascular surgery. 1991;5(6):491-9.
  17. Canning P, Tawfick W, Whelan N, Hynes N, Sultan SJJovs. Cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a high-volume center. 2019;70(2):485-96.
  18. Burgers LT, Vahl AC, Severens JL, Wiersema AM, Cuypers PWM, Verhagen HJM, et al. Costeffectiveness of Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Versus Open Surgical Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2016;52(1):29-40.
  19. Aridi HND, Locham S, Nejim B, Ghajar NS, Alshaikh H, Malas MB. Indications, risk factors, and outcomes of 30-day readmission after infrarenal abdominal aneurysm repair. Journal of vascular surgery. 2018;67(3):747-58. e7.
  20. Hicks CW, Alshaikh HN, Zarkowsky D, Bostock IC, Nejim B, Malas MB. Intensive care unit admission after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair is primarily determined by hospital factors, adds significant cost, and is often unnecessary. Journal of vascular surgery. 2018;67(4):1091-101. e4.
  21. Erben Y, Bews KA, Hanson KT, Da Rocha-Franco JA, Money SR, Stone W, et al. Female Sex is a Marker for Higher Morbidity and Mortality after Elective Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2020;69:1-8.
  22. Major M, Long GW, Eden CL, Studzinski DM, Callahan RE, Brown OWJJoVS. Long-term outcomes and interventions of postoperative type 1a endoleak following elective endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. 2021.
  23. Quinn AA, Mehta M, Teymouri MJ, Keenan ME, Paty PSK, Zhou Y, et al. The incidence and fate of endoleaks vary between ruptured and elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2017;65(6):1617-24.
  24. Salata K, Hussain MA, de Mestral C, Greco E, Aljabri BA, Mamdani M, et al. Comparison of Outcomes in Elective Endovascular Aortic Repair vs Open Surgical Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. JAMA Network Open. 2019;2(7):e196578-e.
  25. Ramaiah VG, Thompson CS, Rodriguez-Lopez JA, DiMugno L, Olsen D, Diethrich EBJJoET. Endovascular repair of AAA rupture 20 months after endoluminal stent-grafting. 2001;8(2):125-30.
  26. Wible BC, Walker TG. Diagnostic Imaging: Interventional Procedures E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017.
  27. Rutherford RB, Krupski WCJJovs. Current status of open versus endovascular stent-graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. 2004;39(5):1129-39.
  28. Beck AW, Goodney PP, Nolan BW, Likosky DS, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Cronenwett JL, et al. Predicting 1-year mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. 2009;49(4):838-44.
  29. Lieberg J, Pruks L-L, Kals M, Paapstel K, Aavik A, Kals JJSJoS. Mortality after elective and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm surgical repair: 12-year single-center experience of Estonia. 2018;107(2):152-7.
  30. Bush RL, Johnson ML, Collins TC, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Yu H-J, et al. Open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in VA hospitals. 2006;202(4):577-87.
  31. Parra JR, Crabtree T, McLafferty RB, Ayerdi J, Gruneiro LA, Ramsey DE, et al. Anesthesia technique and outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair. 2005;19(1):123-9.