Document Type : Case Report


1 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

3 Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

4 Department of Gynecology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

5 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Chamran Heart Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran


BACKGROUND: Critical aortic stenosis (AS) is an unusual cardiac pathology in pregnancy, but has significant impact on the fetal and maternal outcomes of pregnancy. Pregnant patients with aortic stenosis and heart failure represent a major challenge for the heart team and anesthesiologist who should balance the risks and benefits of different treatment strategies and their effects on the mother and fetus.CASE REPORT: We present a 26-year-old parturient who underwent cesarean section at 30 weeks of gestation under general anesthesia in the presence of cardiac surgical team followed by deferred aortic valve replacement after two weeks.CONCLUSION: This report describes the importance of multidisciplinary preoperative evaluation, and careful surgical and anesthetic planning to avoid the deterioration of perioperative cardiac condition in such patients.


  1. Datt V, Tempe DK, Virmani S, Datta D, Garg M, Banerjee A, et al. Anesthetic management for emergency cesarean section and aortic valve replacement in a parturient with severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis and congestive heart failure. Ann Card Anaesth 2010; 13(1): 64-8.
  2. Banning AP, Pearson JF, Hall RJ. Role of balloon dilatation of the aortic valve in pregnant patients with severe aortic stenosis. Br Heart J 1993; 70(6): 544-5.
  3. Podder S, Kumar A, Mahajan S, Saha PK. Initial non-opioid based anesthesia in a parturient having severe aortic stenosis undergoing cesarean section with aortic valve replacement. Ann Card Anaesth 2015; 18(1): 98-100.
  4. Yap SC, Drenthen W, Pieper PG, Moons P, Mulder BJ, Mostert B, et al. Risk of complications during pregnancy in women with congenital aortic
  5. stenosis. Int J Cardiol 2008; 126(2): 240-6.
  6. Ben-Ami M, Battino S, Rosenfeld T, Marin G, Shalev E. Aortic valve replacement during pregnancy. A case report and review of the literature. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1990; 69(7-8): 651-3.
  7. Yuan SM. Bicuspid aortic valve in pregnancy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 53(4): 476-80.
  8. Yentis SM, Dob DP. Caesarean section in the presence of aortic stenosis. Anaesthesia 1998; 53(6): 606-7.
  9. Strickland RA, Oliver WC Jr, Chantigian RC, Ney JA, Danielson GK. Anesthesia, cardiopulmonary bypass, and the pregnant patient. Mayo Clin Proc 1991; 66(4): 411-29.
  10. Fanning N, Balki M, Sermer M, Colman J, Carvalho JC. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring during general anesthesia for Cesarean delivery in a patient with severe aortic stenosis. Can J Anaesth 2011; 58(9): 837-41.